Home | Table of Contents | Arlington Monument | Guest Book | Photos | Shopping | News | Email
Racial dispute
Inadvertent Racism?
Diary Excerpts
British Polar Failures
Man-hauling
versus dogs
Who is "The World's Greatest?"
Is Fiennes
an explorer?
Who really found Ubar?
Classic Polar Suffering
Guinness credits Peary with North Pole discovery
Guinness history?

Titles of nobility

(above) Fiennes man-hauling in Antarctica where Scott died.
"...savage bouts with diarrhea, major weight loss, confusion, bitter fights with Ran...dementia, blindness, and toes described as black bags of pus, ...our muscles poisoned by the ice, the stench of rotting flesh added to our already evil body odors. More a horror story than an adventure epic."
(Amazon.com)
Copyright ©1994, Kirkus Associates, LP. All rights reserved.
An editorial perspective by Henson website creator Bradley Robinson
Is Fiennes qualified to comment on Henson & Peary's dog sledge travel to the North Pole?

(top) Peary & Amundsen each used dogs  for polar success. Note medal from Royal Geographical Society.

Scott man-hauled supplies, without dogs, and died with all of these men.

"Did Peary ski? No, Peary didn't ski. If you want to criticize Peary and you want to have credibility, get some dog sledding experience," Landry says. "Get some experience seeing what the dogs are capable of doing. And then I will listen to you."
In my opinion Fiennes is unqualified to have any opinion on Henson or the 1909 North Pole achievement in general. His knowledge of this polar specialty is outside of his own field of expertise. His only excuse seems to be that he believes Wally Herbert(1). (More about Wally Herbert...)

Fiennes is not an historian so he has no professional credentials, training, or peer review when he comments on the 1909 North Pole expedition.

Peary with his arctic Huskies, purchased from the Smith Sound Eskimos.

The English, traditionally, rejected dogs because of  confusion between household pets and the arctic Husky. They would never use "man's best friend" the way Scott used his own men. That mistake cost Scott's expedition their lives. But arctic Huskies are not pets! Peary described them as wolf-like animals that fought viciously to determine dominance. The winner was the King dog who then led each team. I don't think Fiennes has much real experience with Huskies. Therefore he knows little about the means of polar transportation Henson & Peary mastered to reach the North Pole, and Amundsen the South Pole. But Peary did not ski! Peary used dogs to drag his supplies and used snow shoes when appropriate, and also used skis when appropriate. And sometimes he simply rode in the sledge on flat ground that was easy for the dogs to traverse.
 

 (Photo of Fiennes's
dog from: Living Dangerously
)

This is what we are talking about: Cute little Bothie has unique polar ex-pee-rience. But a lap dog peeing on a Pole is not the same as reaching the Pole with a team of Huskies. Henson & Peary used the powerful arctic Husky to haul their sledges. Fiennes once circumscribed both Poles using Land Rovers (now called Range Rovers), snow mobiles, tractors, air support, etc. This is why we say he is unqualified to comment upon the 1909 North Pole dog sledge achievement that earned the posthumous Hubbard Medal award for Matthew Henson.
 

Man-hauling: The British repeatedly used "long boats" for sledges and men as the dogs to pull them. This spared the real dogs, man's best friend, who stayed home in England comfortably sipping tea before a warm fire.

I think traveling alone without Huskies cost Fiennes his finger tips. In fact, I think that Fiennes last North Pole trek would have killed him if he had not been air rescued. He also had to be air rescued at the South Pole! In fact, after freezing his hands attempting the North Pole, he cut off his dead finger tips himself with a fret saw. This is not indicative of a man skilled in polar travel the way Peary reached the North Pole in 1909, or how Amundsen reached the South Pole in 1913.
Matt Henson never lost any finger tips, as Fiennes did, during his 18 years in the arctic with Peary, but then Henson never tried to reach the North Pole alone, as Fiennes did. Both Peary and Henson, in their books, discuss how exposed skin freezes in minutes. One never took off one's gloves to plunge bare hands under the freezing ocean. The difference is that Peary and Henson mastered the Inuit ways of living, traveling and surviving in the arctic. That is how they reached the Pole in 1909. That was how they succeeded.
Coming soon: A review titled Living Expensively by Bradley Robinson about Fiennes out of print classic Living Dangerously.
In response to reader letters we feel more needs to be web published about this difficult to understand topic. Hopefully, Bradley's next review will bring insight into the mentality of the remaining vestiges of a "British Empire" from the point of view of an American Colonial.
http://www.maxadventure.
co.uk/exped_north9.htm


(1) from a letter by Michael Kobold.
Home | Table of Contents | Arlington Monument | Guest Book | Photos | Shopping | News | Email

Copyright © 2002 Lord Vernon Russell-Twittledorf Robinson, MCE (Member of the California Empire)